Social Econ Blog

Foreign Policy publishes an interesting article with several nice graphical sidebars detailing foreign policy experts' views of America's war on terror. They don't seem to think things are going that well:

Despite today's highly politicized national security environment, the index results show striking consensus across political party lines. A bipartisan majority (84 percent) of the index's experts say the United States is not winning the war on terror. Eighty-six percent of the index's experts see a world today that is growing more dangerous for Americans. Overall, they agree that the U.S. government is falling short in its homeland security efforts. More than 8 in 10 expect an attack on the scale of 9/11 within a decade. These dark conclusions appear to stem from the experts' belief that the U.S. national security apparatus is in serious disrepair. "Foreign-policy experts have never been in so much agreement about an administration's performance abroad," says Leslie Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and an index participant. "The reason is that it's clear to nearly all that Bush and his team have had a totally unrealistic view of what they can accomplish with military force and threats of force."

Group me in with the experts. Can somebody ask Karl Rove (or any number of other Republican leaders or Fox news commentators) if this makes me some sort of traitor? So hard to tell these days.

(h/t Kevin Drum)